Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andocs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. nomination withdrawn. Mgm|(talk) 20:21, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Andocs

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Page has not been touched by an actual user (not a bot) since, and it is not a notable, and has no history to note of. Hairy Perry  15:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep While the article is a stub, and thus in need of expansion, it also appears to be a real place and thus notable. Edward321 (talk) 15:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I have done a quick search for Andocs and it is a notable place of pilgrimage - have expanded the article thus. Richard Hock (talk) 15:21, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep--Richard, great minds think alike: I was doing the same thing, but got a few more sources. I hope you don't mind that in the ensuing edit conflict I was a bit bold. My apologies, Drmies (talk) 15:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment No worries...  the article looks great now! Richard Hock (talk) 15:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Close you can close this now, I agree that this article has been expanded enough to stand on its own. Hairy  Perry  18:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.