Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andoni Island


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 06:48, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Andoni Island

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't meet with WP:GNG. ||  O rbit   W harf  19:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  ||   O rbit   W harf  19:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islands-related deletion discussions.  ||   O rbit   W harf  19:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:32, 19 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment. This stub is horribly written, but cursory Google searches confirm its environmental significance. Several Google Book hits (mostly snippet views) also indicate historical significance as well. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * So please add the sources. ||  O rbit   W harf  06:47, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per Gene93k, the article should be improved rather than deleted. NemesisAT (talk) 12:22, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 20:17, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, the island has environmental significance, especially the elephants, IUCN report on conservation, Protection plan, studies on impact on wildlife.Gorden 2211 (talk) 02:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:BEFORE applies. Granted, this stub isn’t very well-written; however, a search turns up multiple reliable sources establishing notability and significance, including, , , , and , among others; and this doesn’t include book mentions. The article should be improved with better prose and cited sources, not deleted.  Krillzyx   (talk)   03:34, 26 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.