Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andoria-Mot (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 09:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Andoria-Mot
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. The only coverage I or anyone else was ever able to show is a fan-forum, a passing mention of its product (engine) in a photo-blog, another passing mention of its product in a regional company's museum website and the company's own website. Sadly, last AfD was closed as no consensus as the only people who commented were not familiar with WP:NCOMPANY or even WP:GNG and argued that that existence of the company on Google and Polish Wikipedia is sufficient; sadly the admin for a reason beyond me gave their arguments some weight. Sigh. Let's try this again since on pl Wiki I was already accused of having some secret motives for deleting "perfectly fine and famous companies", ping User:DGG and User:SwisterTwister for a 2nd opinion. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 01:41, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as I found some Books links and I'm not Polish so this would need familiar attention if it can be improved (1945 company may mean something). SwisterTwister   talk  02:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I couldn't find anything but passing mentions. Nowhere is the company discussed, not except one or half sentences. In the book "Legends of our [Polish] motor industry" the company is mentioned once in passing (for its acquisition of Tarpan Honker), and then its engines are mention in passing on three other pages . I don't see anything better. It exists, its products are occasionally mention, and I don't see what would make it encyclopedic. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  02:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  02:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  02:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:59, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 12:43, 10 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.