Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/André Tintant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fencing at the 1900 Summer Olympics – Men's épée. ✗ plicit  14:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

André Tintant

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:SPORTCRIT #5, and violates WP:NOTDATABASE. All we know about him is his name, his nationality, and that he competed in the 1900 Olympics. BilledMammal (talk) 13:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete we have no significant source coverage. There are no sources providing significant source coverage. Such is not really present for all olympic competitors. This is even more pronounced when we are dealing with those who competed in the first three modern Olympics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Fencing at the 1900 Summer Olympics – Men's épée per WP:ATD, WP:PRESERVE, WP:R and WP:CHEAP. Again, the nom is making incorrect claims of violates WP:NOTDATABASE, as this simply isn't true, as non of the four criteria listed there apply.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 14:06, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The general criteria of WP:NOTDATABASE applies, as the data is not put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources. BilledMammal (talk) 14:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 14:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and France. Shellwood (talk) 14:58, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Fencing at the 1900 Summer Olympics – Men's épée per Lugnuts. Alvaldi (talk) 08:59, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect and Merge per above. There may be newspaper articles ... But ...  Nor does he have an article in the French Wikipedia. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 18:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect As per Lugnuts. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:14, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete/Redirect - When most of the four-sentence stub isn't about the subject, the subject probably does not warrant its own article. And yeah, obligatory fails GNG. -Indy beetle (talk) 09:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:13, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Although redirect is OK, there's really not anything worthy of preservation here, just db entries, and the subject is so obscure it's as likely they were looking for someone else, perhaps the theologian of the same name. Jacona (talk) 14:04, 1 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.