Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/André van der Hoek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy (talk) 20:59, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

André van der Hoek

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An earlier version of this article was speedy deleted under WP:G11 as an unambiguous promotion that merely replicated the professor's CV. This version was created immediately after that deletion and does little to improve upon the situation. Taking it to AfD for a final resolution. There is little evidence that this professor meets any of the requirements for senior titles and significant notice of his work at WP:NACADEMIC, and all that can be found during a search are his own departmental listings and some conference appearances. Note that other editors suspect a conflict of interest as well. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 18:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 18:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 18:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 18:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep  per WP:PROF. His works are highly cited as shown on his Google scholar profile (see external links). The current article doesn't read like WP:PROMO to me and certainly does not rise to to the level of WP:TNT. TJMSmith (talk) 18:47, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Recuse. Normally bios of academic computer scientists are something I would weigh in on but he's in a different department in the same school as me. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:20, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clear pass of WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC).
 * Keep. 7000 citations, with many articles having more than 100 citations certainly looks like impact for WP:NPROF C1, even in a high-citation field like computer science. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 17:02, 26 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.