Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrés Molteni (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep based on WP:TENNIS/N ("Tennis figures are presumed to be notable if... The player has won at least one title in any of the ATP Men's Challenger tournaments...") and the subject has won the 2011 Challenger Salinas Diario Expreso, which is on the 2011 ATP Challenger Tour. Closing this early, in that the discussion is escalating beyond a discussion of policy. Mandsford 21:59, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Andrés Molteni
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

3rd nomination. Both deleted for failing Wikiproject Tennis. Still fails notablity KnowIG (talk) 16:20, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: Hey, Molteni passes WP:Notability (sports) now. He has competed in the doubles draw in 2011 Copa Claro (ATP 250), he also won 2011 Challenger Salinas Diario Expreso. So I can't see any reason to delete this article again... This nomination is very funny. PL Alvarez Talk 17:08, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * So why don't you add that to his article. If you don't I will delete. Simples. It's not difficult to write a sentence stating why he is notable in the lead. KnowIG (talk) 18:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Also this nomination is totally unfunny. How about you communicate why he is notable instead of recreating the exact same article. KnowIG (talk) 18:14, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: He surely is notable now so no need for a deletion. What sentence? You can see at the article that he won a challenger tournament so he is automatically notable... Kante4 (talk) 23:08, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * It is not my job to know what he has been upto. It's up to you and PL Alvarez to write in the articles why he is notable. The pair of you are really lazy. You also need to source it. KnowIG (talk) 09:42, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Also don't come on here with a bunch of rubbish hours after I've said something which has now been edited in. Your not funny don't twist the comments. KnowIG (talk) 17:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions.  --  JN  466  23:18, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  --  JN  466  23:18, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Even if he were no good as a tennis player there are still numerous articles that mention him. There is no shortage of references available on Google. Have added one Spanish reference to the article. There are many more that could be added.  Nipson anomhmata   (Talk) 07:47, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.