Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andragogy

Copyvio? See here and here.
 * Delete: If copyvio, then handle it that way. If not, this is borderline original research.  It is an essay, so, whether it's citation stuff or not, it's a plea to readers to change to student-centered learning.  BTW, I've done "student centered learning," and neither I nor the students were very fond of it. ("You're the expert, so why aren't you going to tell us what you know?")  Geogre 02:21, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even if not copyvio, it has an agenda, so it is POV. Not one graf in the article is free of a POV sentence. - KeithTyler 19:14, Sep 15, 2004 (UTC)
 * This is an attempt to explain Malcolm Knowles' theory of adult learning which he called "Andragogy". His work dates back to 1978 so it can't exactly be called a neologism anymore.  Since it's an attempt to explain a noted researcher's theory (which has been independently published and discussed enough to be notable), it's not really original research either.  See, for example, [] or[].  If it survives the copyright investigation, keep and send to cleanup.  Rossami 04:05, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Copyvio with and reinforced by  (PDF, see page 10) dated 1996. It may have been contributed by the author, but I doubt it; the author would presumably have more to say on the topic. - KeithTyler 17:58, Sep 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I found it too, so I've deleted the text and slapped on it. Bishonen 18:09, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)