Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andraphisia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nominator withdrawal and consensus for a Keep. Since there is also consensus for the move I'll do that as well. (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 21:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Andraphisia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This genus name is usually considered to be a synonym of Pachyna, which does not have an article. If Pachyna later exists, this would redirect to that title. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨  04:44, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep and move. If it is a synonym (and one of the page's own sources says it is) then at worst this is a move to Pachyna, retaining the synonym information in the article.  This is not really my subject, but as I understand the convention, since Weymer published before Kirby, Weymer should take precedence in naming. SpinningSpark 12:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:23, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 23:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * is right. I should have thought that through before nominating. There is sufficient sourcing for a stub under that name. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨   01:10, 30 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.