Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andras Felkai Academic Award


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 21:35, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Andras Felkai Academic Award

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This unsourced article from 2009 about a scholarship was proposed for deletion by User:Another Believer. I had to decline PROD as the article has previously been undeleted following a speedy deletion. I have been unable to find sources online to establish that the scholarship meets WP:GNG. kingboyk (talk) 12:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:22, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:08, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing in gnews, gscholar, just 1 hit in gbooks. fails WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 02:13, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I see a couple press releases about past recipients but nothing that meets basic requirements for notability. Glendoremus (talk) 22:12, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I found one good source from my university database: "Hungary : Citi Presents the 2012 Andras Felkai Academic Awards in Hungary",Mena Report, August 30, 2012. The article does give a history of the awards and it's a publication outside of the award's country indicating independent coverage that is significant. However, it is only one source and therefore lacks the multiple sources requirement of WP:N.4meter4 (talk) 18:55, 29 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.