Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andre Gasiorowski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The shoddy nomination nonwithstanding, this has turned into an actual discussion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Andre Gasiorowski

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article needs to be wholly rewritten or deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riskmandi (talk • contribs) 05:17, September 21, 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment Discussion page was created without afd2 template by account with no other edits, and never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now.  I haven't looked at the article itself in detail, but as no policy-based reason for deletion has been advanced here, this seems like it should be a procedural speedy keep.  -- Finngall   talk  16:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. -- Finngall   talk  16:50, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. -- Finngall   talk  16:50, 26 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Procedural keep - I see no rationale or effort given by nominator. He clearly feels the person is notable if rewriting will fix the issues. -  Galatz Talk  17:43, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I'll advance an arguement - poorly sourced article with major BLPCRIME issues. In BEFORE not clear he is notable, most of the coverage he does have is in relation to the Helping Hands NGO he's involved with.Icewhiz (talk) 17:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Yeah, delete. There's just no there there after all the fluff is cut. Drmies (talk) 19:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete fails multiple guidelines on biographies of living people. It either is fluff, or ends up being a major accusation of fraud with little justification.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:18, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- nn and WP:BLP concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:22, 29 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.