Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andre The Giant (DVD)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge to André the Giant. WjBscribe 12:54, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Andre The Giant (DVD)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

nn DVD, just a compilation of matches with Andre. WP is not a directory or indiscriminate source of info. See similar reasoning on WWE DVDs in the afd for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake "The Snake" Roberts: Pick Your Poison Biggspowd 16:23, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to André the Giant or André the Giant. A plausible search term. meshach 16:53, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Two options: Either keep (as a legitimate DVD chronicling the top matches in the career of one of professional wrestling's most famous stars) or redirect/merge per Meshach, and include a graf or two in the main Andre the Giant article. Briguy52748 19:16, 29 April 2007 (UTC)]]
 * Delete I suggest delete and just use to cite it on Andre's article. Govvy 12:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)


 * &emsp; Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  &emsp; Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Redirect to André the Giant. It wasn't even a bio DVD, it was just a DVD (originally VHS) release of his early matches. TJ Spyke 02:43, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The DVD is distinct from the person.  Why should they be the same article?  A distinct compilation deserves an article. Oren0 08:04, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Andre's article. Nothing suggests that a separate article is required to cover this material, and nothing "deserves" an article. Otto4711 15:52, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the main article.  Jody B   talk 18:50, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom. --Infrangible 01:41, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge details into main article. Surely it's more useful to have the details there instead of in a separate article, and the main article is not too long to need sub-articles split out. Smalljim 16:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge I think the information in this article should be added to Andre's article. Kris 01:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.