Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Ciliberti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Of the three keep arguments, I've discounted the two which say nothing beyond let's wait for some other discussion to be completed. That leaves one reasonable argument, citing WP:ANYBIO, but I don't see any evidence that this is a well-known and significant award or honor. If the SNG discussion ends up in a state where it would support keeping this, ping me and if I agree, I'll be happy to back out my close and relist this. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:41, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Andrea Ciliberti

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Ciliberti won a few beauty pageants, but never notable ones at a national level, which is what is needed to make such a win. Her appearance in a reality TV show is not enough to make her notable. Nor does the light and passing coverage we see rise to the level to pass general notability guidelines John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:20, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep We appear to have articles on multiple other Miss USA contestants from the year Ciliberti participated in. Plus, per WP:ANYBIO she "received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times". Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:17, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:17, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Miss Missouri USA as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America1000 17:18, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:07, 16 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project.  No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:37, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater (talk) 00:30, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater (talk) 00:30, 31 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- A unremarkable pageant contestant and WP:ANYBIO #1 surely does not apply, as the event is not significant or well known. The event itself has not been noted as Miss Missouri USA 2005 does not exist. A redirect is unneeded, as it's unlikely that the subject has been noted enough for the name to have become a valid search term. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:47, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment on the "keep for now" !vote: The discussion is happening here, and there is no indication that the consensus would be that a Miss [State] USA would be considered notable, unless they meet GNG. Thus I don't believe that suspending this AfD would serve a useful purpose. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep for now, pending outcome of SNG pageant RfC. Aoziwe (talk) 12:43, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per K.e.coffman. There's no real reason to wait for SNG that I can see. Neutralitytalk 22:08, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment People who make reference to ongoing RfCs in deletion discussions should at least link to them. This link might work.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.