Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Concepcion (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. G4 - Recreation of material deleted via discussion. Additionally, notability not demonstrated — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  17:05, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Andrea Concepcion
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Unsourced bio for an actress of dubious notability. Her film career is three roles over ten years (two of which when she was five or younger) and on TV it looks like mainly bit parts. Her "big break" - or so the article says - will come in 2010 when a soap opera she is filming debuts, but for now there's no notability.  Mbinebri  talk &larr; 16:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, this might qualify as a G4 speedy - and it's been deleted twelve times previously.   Mbinebri   talk &larr; 16:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * G4 and salt, already been speedied shinty-six times and clearly fails notability. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator. No notability; WP:CRYSTAL. Given the article history, WP:SALT per Hammer. I42 (talk) 18:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above concerns with notability.  Them From  Space  19:20, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable and salt. In fact the impressive deletion log shows that it was salted by RHaworth last September - how did it manage to get created again? JohnCD (talk) 21:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ha! I see how it got recreated despite being salted: it was created, this time, as "Andrea Concepcion.", with a period at the end, and then C.Fred moved it to the correct title - as he is an admin, that over-rode the salting. JohnCD (talk) 10:04, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.