Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Gabriel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 20:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Andrea Gabriel

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:BLP of an actress, not properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NACTOR. As always, an actress's notability doesn't hinge on just listing acting roles per se, it hinges on the extent to which the article can or can't be referenced to media coverage about her and her performances: articles about her, reviews of her films or TV shows which single her performance out for dedicated attention, properly sourced evidence that she won or was nominated for a major acting award, and on and so forth. But the sole footnote here is a short blurb which glancingly namechecks Andrea Gabriel's existence without being about Andrea Gabriel in any non-trivial sense, which isn't enough to get her over GNG all by itself if it's the only source she's got. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be the subject of a lot more coverage than this. Bearcat (talk) 21:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 21:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: I don't find coverage in RS, this is typical, simple photo essay with a few words on her new role. We'd need extensive coverage, this just isn't enough. Oaktree b (talk) 00:50, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: I could not find anything in industry publications (Variety, Deadline Hollywood) announcing new and additional roles except for one extremely-brief TV guide article for the Gossip Girl role . While it is clear she has a robust television resume, there is simply not enough coverage at this time. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 2:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: There are more to notability as Wikipedia is based in sources cited in articles. I can't find SIGCOV or any award & nom. for her achievements in the film industry. I wonder how the subject had portrayed roles in TV shows yet not even two sources had cited her (in exception even interviews)  Otuọcha   (talk) 05:56, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.