Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Harrington


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is consensus that the sources available do not establish notability under our guidelines. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:35, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Andrea Harrington

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Country DA is not necessarily notable. If the post isn't notable, the first person of an under-represented group to hold it does not automatically become notable either.  DGG ( talk ) 08:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete being a district attorney at the state level is not notable. Being a US District attorney is general considered a sign of notability, although on occasion I have even seen articles on such deleted. US district attorney's cover much bigger areas and enforce federal law. We do not have sourcing to show notability here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:16, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose as creator. I have expanded the article with a number of new sources, including a variety of media including local, state, and national publications. There are now more sources than several other current DA articles. --Slugger O&#39;Toole (talk) 15:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per John Pack Lambert. Classic case of WP:REFBOMB. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Have you read all of the sources? Several are just passing mentions but others are in depth profiles. I think the citations here are much stronger than, say Rachael Rollins. -- Slugger O&#39;Toole (talk) 00:46, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲 水 11:41, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Coment The most recent comment probably indicates that the article on Rachel Rollins should be nominated for deletion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:36, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete not a position of sufficient notability without independent reliable sourcing. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 21:24, 29 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.