Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Johanson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete. WWGB (talk) 06:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC) (NAC)

Andrea Johanson

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not appear to match criteria for notability per WP:N / WP:POLITICIAN - currently unelected candidate, it's not a first-level sub-national election, and no alternative sources to cite notability for any other reason. Contested prod. CultureDrone (talk) 10:50, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ol Yeller  '''Talktome 11:19, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete She's a candidate for the Queensland state legislature, and this puff piece is her advertisement ("Throughout her career, Andrea has worked in several customer service roles, particularly in the Hospitality industry"). Wikipedia is not the place to run your state legislative campaign.  Print some damn bumper stickers. Mandsford (talk) 13:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom (fails WP:POLITICIAN)... - Adolphus79 (talk) 16:49, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; fails WP:POLITICIAN. Frickeg (talk) 22:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. One of a long list of candidates added by this contributor. Not a sitting or past MP--Dmol (talk) 23:07, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —WWGB (talk) 06:19, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't generally like "per nom" statements but Mandsford has expressed it so well, there is little need for me to add much more; save that we could redirect to Liberal National Party or the election article if we were feeling generous. The LNP need to learn some lesson from the other parties and get up to speed on how to spam Wikipedia or these will just continue to be deleted. -- Mattinbgn\talk 06:52, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.