Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Lambert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Notability rationale seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  18:12, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Andrea Lambert

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod contested by author. Independent author/artist whose references are all self-generated, internal publications of her graduate school, or event listings that only mention subject's name. Fails notability requirements at WP:CREATIVE. justinfr (talk/contribs) 11:37, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Basement12 (T.C) 15:04, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:Notability.  DRosenbach  ( Talk 19:48, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Dear editors: I am new to wikipedia, and apologize if the previous article was too flamboyant. Please let me know what I can do to improve the article so that it is more appropriate. I will gladly add more citations, or make changes as requested.

As a sidenote: I would draw your attention to the other "famous" residents of North Hollywood. Stephen Christian, while his band is notable, has posted a lengthy, self-promoting (and rather poorly written)excerpt from his self-published novel. Bria Myles, while quite beautiful, is famous mainly for dancing scantily clad.

Who is truly notable, here? We are hollywood north.

Lambert is a struggling, independent writer who is trying to find her way. She has a thirteen-year exhibition and performance career, and a contract with Future Fiction London for her first novel. Many, many pages, have gone into this, years of starvation, institutionalization, and striving with her craft.

Is there perhaps a way to modify this article so that it is more acceptable? Thank you for your consideration. Deedwhite (talk) 22:51, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The problem isn't the article per se but the notability of the subject. In order to have an article she must meet the guidelines in WP:CREATIVE. WP is a place to describe people who are already notable, not a place to build notability. Lastly, you're right about the Christian article. I removed that section from the article. justinfr (talk/contribs) 01:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - no reliable sources to establish notabiliy. The references provided are event listings and whatnot and don't establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 16:51, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.