Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Feymark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:54, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Andreas Feymark

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The highest office that he got is winning the municipal election, and in my opinion that has not satisfy the requirement of WP:NPOL yet. He lost the general election and the regional election. There is nothing in the article that showed that he is notable otherwise. &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   01:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;     (contact)   01:14, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;     (contact)   01:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per norminator. Currently doesn't demonstrate enough to satisfy WP:NPOL. Jamiebuba (talk) 06:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Same reasoning as in the similar case of Articles for deletion/Mikael Simm. /Julle (talk) 12:54, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - at this time no notability indicated. Could be recreated in future.BabbaQ (talk) 13:43, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete some power within the party structure, but no indications of satisfying GNG nor NPOL. Draken Bowser (talk) 19:39, 18 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Doesn't satisfy WP:NPOL, as per above it could be recreated in the future. echidnaLives  -  talk  - edits   22:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as nommed; it's not just that he doesn't meet NPOL yet, we don't know that he ever will (CRYSTALBALL and all that). Sources are all primary and/or routine campaign reporting etc. --


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.