Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Ploner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (talk) 20:21, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Andreas Ploner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable amateur player. No coverage in reliable sources, has won a few amateur events, appeared in some professional tournaments but did not get far. Does not meet WP:GNG. Previously nominated for CSD A7 by Velella, deletion tag appears to have been removed by the article's creator, unclear if an admin ever actually took a look at the page. signed,Rosguill talk 22:10, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:39, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:39, 6 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - as noted above, I believed that this was a speedy delete candidate. I see nothing notable about this minor amateur player - I personally would almost qualify for notability if this one was kept.  Velella  Velella Talk 08:23, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - in general, snooker players are not considered notable until they have turned professional. Nothing notable in his career as yet, appearing at ranking tournaments does not count for WP:GNG. Andygray110 (talk) 20:37, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Possibly WP:TOOSOON. If he qualified for the main tour, he'd be fine.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:38, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable player.— Mythdon ( talk  •  contribs ) 08:59, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.