Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrej Studen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This is partially because it doesn't seem like the nominator is seeking article deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:28, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Andrej Studen

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article was created by me, but it has now been tagged as not notable enough (as per WP:GNG). I have thus nominated it for deletion, but have also highlighted the person's notability and added another source. In my opinion, he meets GNG as he has "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (as evidenced by the added refs). I look forward to hearing the opinion of the community. TadejM my talk 03:29, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and History. TadejM my talk 03:29, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:13, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Slightly weak keep. In additional to the RTV obit in the article currently, there is also a substantial Dnevnik obit .  I think these are probably enough for GNG, although the Slovenian media market is so small that I don't think it's a slam dunk.  I don't see much sign of WP:NPROF, but WP:NAUTHOR (or WP:NCREATIVE) would be more expected for someone in history, anyway.  This would generally required multiple reviews of multiple works in reliable sources: there is one review of an authored book in the article now .  I found also this review of an exhibition Studen curated , which I think might support notability. I'm not so fluid in searching in Slovenian, so I did not look exhaustively. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 14:14, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, I noticed coverage in several media, with obituaries, some of which were linked above. Extensive covering, not just death mention. Meets GNG to me. --Tone 20:45, 20 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.