Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andres Bretel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. 1) Created by User:Andresbretel. 2) User:Andresbretel has made no edits other than to create this article and add it to a list article. 3) No third-party sources, no indication that anyone will add any, and considering that 4) the only articles that link to this page are two lists, I can't see why anyone would. 5) Verifiability is a non-negotiable pillar of our encyclopaedia. The above and the lack of overwhelming feeling or argument to the contrary below is sufficient reason to remove this self-promotion. --Sam Blanning(talk) 23:12, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Andres Bretel
Notability appears to be questionable. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 05:44, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 *  Weak Keep Producers are for obvious reasons not in the public spot-light as much as the artists they work with, maybe creating the perception that they're less notable. Librarianofages 05:52, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep given the extensive number of records he appears to have worked on. Possibly needs verification. Delete due to verification problems. Capitalistroadster 06:31, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets notability criteria. --Ter e nce Ong 07:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, but needs to be wikified, verified, and expanded. Mystache 13:38, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete.On google I could find no english language references to this person that weren't repackaged wikipedia pages. The only spanish language pages simply had a list of discs only for a few of which he was mentioned (not notable).  Andres' official website, as referenced in article, is broken. Information is unverifiable Corrigann 21:40, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN rhmoore 22:41, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep V For great justice. 22:48, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.