Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Bernie Wilson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close – article already WP:CSD'ed by as per WP:A7. (non-admin closure) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Andrew Bernie Wilson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per the PROD by : "Article about a person who does not appear to meet WP:GNG, part of a flurry of articles created by the same editor to promote a studio that's trying to be successful at animation. All related articles have been PRODed, speedied, or are at AfD. This doesn't appear Wikipedia ready".

PROD removed by article creator. Sky Warrior  02:38, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Sky  Warrior  02:38, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Sky  Warrior  02:39, 15 May 2017 (UTC)


 * DELETE As noted at WP:Articles for deletion/Clyde and Willis (animated series) this is part of a set of clearly WP:PROMO articles about this animation group and its members by someone with WP:COI issues, and none of them appear to meet WP:GNG. JamesG5 (talk) 03:03, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * NOTE - After doing a bit more digging here and at the other article WP:Articles for deletion/Clyde and Willis (animated series) this is < > using a game platform to make YouTube videos. All the references given for "deals" to buy the show do not check out.  Andrew's YouTube has just over 100 subscribers and barely 2000 views.  The new editor below suggesting "keep" shows by his edits he's another Roblox user in the friends group.  Contrary to claims made that Andrew is "infamous" or that "He's famous.  Everyone is." he does not appear to meet WP:GNG. JamesG5 (talk) 15:21, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   03:41, 15 May 2017 (UTC)


 * KEEP Notable YouTube Personality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aca rblx (talk • contribs) 12:52, 15 May 2017 (UTC)  — Aca rblx (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * NOTE The above editor campaigning for a delete is making false claims. He suggests that I know andrew which I do not. He is assuming that by the age of the person that the article is about that he is not notable. This is called age discrimination. Also they are participating in subscribercount discrimination. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aca rblx (talk • contribs) 17:25, 15 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete makes no credible indication of notability. Uncle Roy (talk) 12:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 *  Delete  does not meet WP:GNG. While I will allow another to make the call on the CSD, it is clearly not meeting inclusion criteria.Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:18, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * speedy deleteDlohcierekim (talk) 16:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete no references provided for coverage in reliable secondary sources. -- ‖ Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders  ‖ 16:33, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Seems to already be deleted prior to the close of this afd.....South Nashua (talk) 18:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.