Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Blake Ames


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. As mentioned, there simply isn't the significant coverage required at the moment. Black Kite (t) (c) 12:06, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Andrew Blake Ames

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Individual of questionable notability. Despite the plethora of external links and references given only two of them mention him by name, IMDB and his own website. Other than that it's just another non-notable autobiography.  role player 15:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I have moved the IP comment above and signed the second part to show they are both from the same IP, despite claiming to be different people. Yoenit (talk) 16:58, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Moved them into a collapsed box so we wouldn't have to deal with them cluttering up the otherwise productive AfD. Sven Manguard  Talk  01:03, 13 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment And we have yet a third person from the same IP advocating a keep in this AFD. Dear 150.162.199.3, stop doing this. Everybody can see in the article history all these comments come from the same IP. If it truly is a public library computer then how come people from Texas and Florida use it while it geolocates to Brazil? Keep pretending to be multiple people and you will be blocked from editing as you are violating the sockpuppet policy. Yoenit (talk) 21:01, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator. Fails all policies at WP:ANYBIO, WP:BASIC, WP:ENT, and WP:BLP1E--Kudpung (talk) 21:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - there is an open question about whether his roles are significant, but there are also plenty of reliable sources that can be found easily by clicking the Google and Google news links above. This actor has quite a resume; whether that is enough is entirely the community's call.  However, a semblance of a decent article could be constucted that passes WP:GNG.  The IP addresses are not helping their case, but that is of no consequence. Bearian (talk) 23:08, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete All I can see are simple mentions of him, no actual coverage of him as a person. So unless I'm missing something the article fails WP:VERIFIABILITY. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 14:37, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Online search yields next to nothing valuable, heavy on the promo biography, sources are not that great. Also, any chance this article had at me working to help it up and died when I saw the IP's comments. Sven Manguard  Talk  01:00, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.