Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew C. Miller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 12:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Andrew C. Miller

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability disputed. Not everyone who has written emedicine articles needs a Wikipedia article. Current content fails WP:PROF. JFW | T@lk  20:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  —WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:54, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - although less puffy WP:PEACOCKing compared to Rashid M. Rashid article also up for deletion makes it seem perhaps more likely notablity could be established - getting to contribute to a widely used source (eMedicine) is weakly supportive - but overall I just don't see notablity for inclusion in wikipedia as yet established. David Ruben Talk 22:01, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails establish notability as per WP:PROF. Plastikspork (talk) 02:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: Doesn't demonstrate notability. Zodon (talk) 04:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Only eight papers in Scopus, none cited more than twice. Not yet an authority in his field. DGG (talk) 13:40, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - As per User:Plastikspork's rational. kilbad (talk) 11:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.