Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Clarke (Author)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:00, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Andrew Clarke (Author)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable author lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO.  ttonyb (talk) 00:16, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. He fails WP:AUTHOR, which clearly shows that an author must have done more than just written books- those books must have been important in some way. There is nothing to show that he is an important figure (on the contrary, there is very little coverage of him, which is shown by only one of the sources being about him), and his works are not significant enough to meet the notability requirements for authors. --Slon02 (talk) 02:08, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Much as I like Andrew's work, he fails notability. Additionally Andrew himself appears to be the primary editor of the article, the lack of other editors making contributions is a problem. Sorry Andrew but there's little or no justification to keep. --Falcadore (talk) 21:27, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.