Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Conboy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Andrew Conboy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Low-level minor league player who fails to meet both WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. The only references on the page are WP:ROUTINE contract signing notices and the like. DJSasso (talk) 11:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. DJSasso (talk) 12:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per nom, who pretty much said it all.   Ravenswing   13:24, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete He falls just short of NHOCKEY and after a quick search about him only one story from his career is from a notable source. Deadman137 (talk) 05:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment/Question Since Conboy played ten games in the EIHL in the UK, which "is the highest level of ice hockey competition in the United Kingdom," does he pass NHOCKEY per the first criterion (namely, participation in a "top professional league")? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebbillings (talk • contribs) 22:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Response Per WP:NHOCKEY/LA, the answer to my question is no, and Conboy definitely fails NHOCKEY. ebbillings (talk) 22:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage and fails NHOCKEY.Mdtemp (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.