Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Crossley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:44, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Andrew Crossley

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Probably non-notable comics colorist. I found this page when searching for a different Andrew Crossley, the head of law firm ACS:Law; most of the Google hits relate to him. I found one in-depth article about this Andrew Crosley,, but I do not believe this suffices for our notability requirements (and I doubt that being twice nominated for a Comics Buyer's Guide award makes him notable either). I recommend deleting this article, and redirecting Andrew Crossley to ACS:Law. Robofish (talk) 22:26, 7 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'm confident in your judgement on this matter. Note that I only did RC patrol-related cleanup on the article, when I edited in 2005. --  Zanimum (talk) 21:25, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:30, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacks coverage in reliable sources. A single inteview isn't sufficient to establish notability, nor are a couple of nominations for awards that he did not win according to the article. -- Whpq (talk) 19:54, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.