Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew D. Gordon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) B  music  ian  16:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Andrew D. Gordon

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article fails to meet WP:BASIC. Article is sourced by a the subject's own personal webpage, and significant coverage in reliable sources is not found. Prolvman (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 2 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Two of his publications have over 1000 citations each, and 20 of them have over 100. That is more than enough for a pass of WP:PROF, and provides plenty of material for third-party sourcing about his research. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:14, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep. To add the WoS perspective to David's stats: 44 papers with citation counts 332, 272, 214...conclusively passes WP:PROF #1. Agricola44 (talk) 16:28, 3 February 2012 (UTC).
 * Keep Per David Eppstein. —Ruud 10:18, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.