Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Dakich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Andrew Dakich

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reasons for contesting the WP:PROD do not seeem satisfactory reasons to support notability. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:33, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 22:25, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 22:25, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Really not a player of note. He did get a small amount of press for his viral scholarship video, but that's a single-event and frankly if we're going to have Wikipedia articles for every person who stars in a viral video that makes the rounds for a few days then we ought to just get rid of notability criteria. Fails WP:SUSTAINED, WP:INHERITED, and WP:SINGLEEVENT Rikster2 (talk) 22:07, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet the notability criteria for either basketball players or college atheletes.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails GNG and SINGLEEVENT. Jrcla2 (talk) 03:27, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 17:31, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - a non-notable basketball playe. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   23:49, 2 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.