Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Davis (consultant)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 03:22, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Andrew Davis (consultant)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article reads like a coat rack with mostly unreferenced facts which i have not been able to verify easily online. Subject himself does not appear to rise to the level of notability required. James of UR (talk) 19:40, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete This isn't an encyclopedic article, it's a resume. There is a huge laundry list of unsourced claims in the article. The few sources mostly fail WP:RS and the one that doesn't isn't enough to ring the WP:N bell. A Google failed to yield much of anything in the first 5 pages of hits. (Caveat: The subject is cursed with a common name). Even if I were convinced of the notability of the subject (and I am light years from that) this article is hopelessly promotional. It would be better to scrap it and start over. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:27, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Notability not found. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC).
 * Delete -- REdlinked businesses suggest NN.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.