Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Fedynsky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 19:34, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Andrew Fedynsky
Non-notable person, either redirect to Cleveland Ukrainian Museum or delete. Chipka 16:49, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly non-notable. Jefffire 16:53, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable, and barely anything worthy through google. --- Missvain 16:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wikipedia is not paper, and not google. Snugspout 18:54, 15 June 2006 (UTC).
 * Um... isn't the "Wikipedia is not google argument" usually a pro-deletion argument? Bwithh 19:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Since we have an article on the museum Fedynsky relates to, he has liability to have an article. Lorty 18:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of notability sufficient to justify his own article. Don't redirect to the Museum (who knows when the position may change hands? - just including his name in the museum article should be more than enough and easier to change later on). Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, but it is generally considered to be an attempt at an encyclopedia.... Wikipedia is not google Bwithh 19:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect. Only notable for museum. - Kookykman| (t) e 20:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not significantly notable. Dipics 18:47, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete nn and likely qualify for --WinHunter (talk) 16:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.