Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Franck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jenks24 (talk) 11:42, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Andrew Franck

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The page appears to be largely promotional and taken from the andrewfranck.net website. The references consist largely of primary source material. I tried to establish his notability esp. on the music front without success. Karst (talk) 13:59, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete. As Karst said, lots of the stuff is directly from his website. prod was removed eight years ago without explanation. I did several searches, but could not find independent, third party sources. —gdfusion (talk&#124;contrib) 05:50, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:54, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - The references are dead or do not reference the subject at all or only tangentially. None are reliable sources of notability.--Rpclod (talk) 02:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - The evidence for this article's promotional nature is overwhelming. The original author's contributions page is highly suspicious, including the removal of a prod and an orphan tag. The account only has one mainspace edit outside of the article in question. - Lord  Bromblemore  21:14, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.