Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Garton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  23:58, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Andrew Garton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable, seems to fail WP:MUSICIAN. Problematic article cited exclusively to self-published sources. Few external Ghits.  Ohc  ¡digame! 08:00, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:22, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:22, 1 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep passes criteria No. 1, 7, and 10 at WP:MUSBIO. Recently added references are independent of the artist and support claims to notability.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:58, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - looks a bit puffed-up (and could do with depuffing), but I concur with Shaidar cuebiyar that he scrapes in - David Gerard (talk) 17:25, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 10:37, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, as per Shaidar cuebiyar's comments.Dan arndt (talk) 01:33, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.