Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Gibson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep. Clearly meets WP:BIO, and the nominator doesn't even support deletion. If you want to discuss notability in general, please use the talk page. --Wafulz 18:10, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Andrew Gibson


Is this curler notable enough? I think so, but I wanted to see what the people think. Weak keep at the moment. --Nlu (talk) 16:51, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong, somewhat obvious keep Maybe I'm biased because I love curling, but anyone who's won a medal at the yearly world championships of a pretty big sport is certainly notable per WP:BIO, as Gibson is very clearly a sportsperson who has played at the highest competitive level of his sport. -- Kicking222 17:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I'm no expert on curling but by his credentials he seems to be reasonably notable in the curling world. HamishMacBeth 17:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - Clearly satisfies athletic criteria for WP:Bio. → bobby← 17:33, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as I think there is ample evidence he meets WP:BIO as an athlete.--Isotope23 17:43, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - won medal at a world championship for his sport -- Whpq 17:52, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * keep He has won awards in field, so in the world of curling, he is indeed notable.NASCARfan1 18:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC