Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Hageman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep - CrazyRussian talk/email 18:00, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Andrew Hageman

 * Delete Not notable, seems to just be a local player in Ireland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GuBu (talk • contribs) 10:55, 19 July 2006
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Has only played U21's - the article site shows appearances : League 0, Total 0
 * Keep seems probable he will be playing shortly (see my talk page) Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  19:37, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no professional appearances (WP:BIO). -- Daduzi  talk  10:19, 21 July 2006 (UTC) withdrawing delete vote, highly borderline case. -- Daduzi   talk  11:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I would vote to toss if he was still on the U-21's, but he's starting a two-year first team contract this season.  He's a professional player with a professional contract.  The article didn't make that 100% clear, so I stated it more explicitly.  Anyway, a first team player in the Irish equivelent of the premiership is notable enough for my tastes.  Vickser 07:30, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not Notable, this is not the place to host profiles of highschool soccer stars. JeffMurph 08:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * How is he comparable to a high school soccer player? He's got a professional contract in one of the better teams in the premier Irish league. Vickser 13:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This was User:JeffMurph's first post. -- Alias Flood 17:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep he satisfies WP:N due to professional contract. -- Alias Flood 17:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, satisfying WP:N with a professional contract. RFerreira 21:02, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Vickser -- Andymarczak 08:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.