Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Konopelsky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. L Faraone  03:44, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Andrew Konopelsky

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Footballer who fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG - Oleola (talk) 21:03, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  21:24, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  21:24, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  21:24, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. czar   &middot;   &middot;  21:25, 4 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - The article technically meets WP:NSPORT, but the obvious failure of WP:GNG outweighs a single brief appearance in a fully pro match six years ago. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:33, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - failure of WP:GNG outweighs the fact he passes WP:NFOOTBALL by the skin of his teeth. WP:COMMONSENSE and past consensus supports this. GiantSnowman 14:05, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Very weak delete - the article ever so slightly passes NFOOTBALL, but probably won't pass GNG. I found a few brief mentions of his career on Polish online sites, which I've added to the article, but I don't think it is enough to meet the GNG. Jogurney (talk) 17:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - While I agree with Sir Sputnik and GiantSnowman, I don't agree that this is an "obvious failure of GNG". Would you mind elaborating why this subject fails GNG? Mentoz86 (talk) 12:28, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.