Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew L. Smith, D.M.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 03:26, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Andrew L. Smith, D.M.

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability concerns. Does not meet criteria for notability for academics. &mdash; ERcheck (talk) 18:05, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nominator, non notable Lets  drink  Tea  18:09, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 18:20, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ACADEMIC. THF (talk) 18:25, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ACADEMIC, and the fact that there is a lack of independent sources to indicate notability.  Jd 027  talk 18:28, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * delete publications don't amount to notability. Only one look promising, his thesis, which appears to be uncited  according to GS. Fails WP:PROF. Pete.Hurd (talk) 03:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom and Pete.Hurd.--Eric Yurken (talk) 01:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.