Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Lauer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. bd2412 T 04:21, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Andrew Lauer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Person does not meet WP:N -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 23:02, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I cant find any evidence of notability. Mccapra (talk) 23:40, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:58, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:58, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:58, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:58, 6 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment this here is the version of the article before the nominator slashed it before taking it to AFD which I disagree with as he removed the claims of significance such as the actor's four years in the main cast of Caroline in the City, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:12, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I removed poorly sourced and unsourced information from a WP:BLP. If you have good sourcing then present it. -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 01:59, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * You also removed uncontentious information cited to acceptable primary sources such as the official website of Caroline in the City which is acceptable for uncontroversial facts Atlantic306 (talk) 20:57, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete insufficient sourcing to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep It’s not proper, the nominator has removed large sunk of details without discussion and subsequently nominating for AfD; people won’t trust Wikipedia if this sort of underhand gaming the system will continue.Eesan1969 (talk) 06:33, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:NACTOR his role in  the main cast of Caroline in the City is a significant role and was nominated for the Emmy Award for  21 Jump Street and in combination with other roles passes criteria 1 and also may scrape through WP:DIRECTOR..Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:58, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:NACTOR, also Emmy award nomination as well. WP:ANYBIO Wm335td (talk) 16:55, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:26, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as the actor has significant roles in very notable series such as Caroline in the City and 21 Jump Street which can easily be confirmed in reliable sources, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:01, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment. I went to close this, but the keep rationales are unsupported. Lauer was in Caroline in the City (74 episodes?), yes, but where was he "nominated for an Emmy"? He was only in two episodes of 21 Jump Street. I don't see how this actor has "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." I see just one. czar  14:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * According to the following source - Emmy Award nomination, 1989, for 21 Jump Street.Eesan1969 (talk) 14:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * That's not supported by the Academy's website: -- Scott Burley (talk) 19:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, multiple nominations would be needed to meet WP:ANYBIO #1. -- Scott Burley (talk) 20:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - Has had supporting roles in a number of notable (if mostly unremarkable) films, as well as being a main character on Caroline in the City and the first season of Grand. While it is difficult to assess the significance of most of these roles, I think he is likely to meet WP:NACTOR #1. -- Scott Burley (talk) 20:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.