Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Leipzig


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:04, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Andrew Leipzig

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable, only coverage is blogs and a local press mention. Appears to be an autobiography (main editor's username matches a url owned by this person). Declined prod. Hairhorn (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2011 (UTC) __________________________________ Relevance as noted by critic Jean-Pierre Dubois: http://jpdubs.hautetfort.com/archive/2009/07/06/le-baiser-dans-l-art.html and comparative such as http://jpdubs.hautetfort.com/archive/2009/07/06/le-baiser-dans-l-art.html show significance through inclusion in historical artworks. additional articles not mentioned in NY examiner and artworks and articles in London Street Art Design issues 3 and 7 http://www.londonstreetartdesign.com. Original post was not by Mr. Leipzig only corrections to biographical references and additions of examples were provided through his studio http://planetzig.com which is not mentioned as to not be an advert. Include.Twistedchrome (talk) 06:18, 6 August 2011 — Twistedchrome (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 6 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per per WP:BIO. Beagel (talk) 20:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of sources on Google and Yahoo that could help a biography. SwisterTwister   talk  21:07, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:ARTIST and needs more sources to pass WP:GNG. Local press can help establish notability, but there's not enough in this case. Lagrange613 (talk) 04:15, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.