Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Lin

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 09:24, May 2, 2005 (UTC)

Andrew Lin
inconclusive Google results, as he shares his name with an actor or something like that; non-notable; namespace should be freed up for the more noteworthy person of that name. Master Thief Garrett 23:41, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

NOTE: the original author has TWICE THREE TIMES FOUR TIMES removed the Vfd notice, this should be taken into account when voting. Due to some other (unrelated) vandalism I have now officially listed this User on Vandalism in progress. Master Thief Garrett 05:15, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Delete, vanity --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 06:42, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) WITHDRAWN
 * Delete, unless someone wishes to completely replace it with the other famous person. Sorry, but Wikipedia is not your local college yearbook. Master Thief Garrett
 * Note: the original user has removed the VFD notice from the page. I have replaced. -Rholton 00:43, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, I noticed that! I make a habit of adding all things I report to my Watchlist to monitor vandalism such as this, and it's repeatedly paid off. Master Thief Garrett 01:18, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * The original editor removed the notice again. See, my monitoring system works! Master Thief Garrett 01:56, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) EDIT: As I was saying... Master Thief Garrett 03:24, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) EDIT: and the saga continues... Master Thief Garrett 04:17, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Megan1967 04:45, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Vegaswikian 06:41, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Vanity, although eating 153 bananas 18 days before he was born almost makes him notable. Dsmdgold 15:02, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity. utcursch | talk 09:37, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. After reading this it now makes sense concerning the contributions this user has been making to various Sugar talk pages around wikipedia. He seems to be a bit of a troublemaker. I attempted to put an article the anon user created called Sugar blues up for speedy deletion but another regular user disagreed with the nomination. --Randolph 03:55, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.