Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Mathwick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 22:21, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Andrew Mathwick

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD removed by IP who I assume is the page's creator given the user made the exact same edits back to the page after my series of contributions to clean it up. Subject lacks any significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 14:29, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - one RS is not nearly enough to meet the GNG. Aboutmovies (talk) 21:33, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Our one RS amounts to "hey, someone is doing some cool writing in our readership area." This is not the general quality of article to suggest the person is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Apart from the Emily Hoard article, I find nothing reliable. For now he fails WP:BASIC and WP:NAUTHOR. Sam Sailor Talk! 15:37, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 15:38, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 15:38, 23 July 2016 (UTC)


 * delete unique name makes searching easy. unfortunately, I could not source it.  perhaps it is merely WP:TOOSOON.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:52, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.