Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Mulligan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 13:31, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Andrew Mulligan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Searches overall found nothing to suggest solid independent notability and only finding passing mentions for the TV shows, I found nothing to even suggest a redirect to one of the listed shows. WP:TNT at best if ever notable. It's also worth noting there's some serious vandalism here (see history) that emphasizes how this is simply best deleted. I suggest it would be best if deleted. Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat  23:25, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Part of this message is actually from my PROD, "Searches overall found nothing to suggest solid independent notability and only finding passing mentions for the TV shows, I found nothing to even suggest a redirect to one of the listed shows. WP:TNT at best if ever notable. It's also worth noting there's some serious vandalism here (see history) that emphasizes how this is simply best deleted." with which I still confirm and echo supporting as there's simply nothing obvious to suggest better notability and improvement here. Notifying tagger . SwisterTwister   talk  23:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment I have found some sources and have updated the page. Not sure if this helps or not! --TheDomain (talk) 02:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete None of those new sources help. Those sources, taken together, don't meet WP:BASIC, and I quote: "trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability"  Schwede 66  18:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, lacks non-trivial coverage. AddMore der Zweite (talk) 09:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.