Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Ousley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:10, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Andrew Ousley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:ANYBIO the sources do not prove notability and nothing more was found in a search. I analysed the 28 sources and none are sufficent to prove notability as per WP:GNG. 1: subject's company is affiliated to wework 2: passing mention 3: passing mention on a blog 4: interview in a blog 5: press release posted by the subject 6: press release posted by the subject 7: single line quote from the subject as publicist fro an album 8: press release posted by the subject 9: blog that has a copy paste of a press release posted by the subject 10: press release posted by the subject 11: alumni lisitng 12: doesn't mention subject 13: podcast by the subject as a contibutor 14: article written by the subject 15: credit on a photo taken by the subject 16: behind paywall but doesn't seem to concern the subject himself 17: passing mention and credit on a photo 18: doesn't mention the subject 19: doesn't mention the subject 20: passing mention in a local interest what's on website 21: photo credit in a blog 22: doesn't mention the subject 23: doesn't mention the subject 24: doesn't mention the subject 25: doesn't mention the subject 26: photo credit and quote from the subject 27: broken link 28: bio about the subject's father on his church's web site Domdeparis (talk) 09:49, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:17, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:17, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete no indication of meeting notability requirements.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:26, 27 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 04:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete A lack of persistence and depth of coverage in independent third-party reliable sources, insufficient to pass WP:ANYBIO. &mdash; fortuna  velut luna  12:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.