Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Phillip Almanza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 19:01, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Andrew Phillip Almanza

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of article seems fairly unremarkable with poorly sourced material. Additionally, the article seems to have been created by the subject himself, judging by his post to Instagram: http://instagram.com/p/5xTPGmqHoq/?taken-by=andrewalmanzaaa Aus0107 (talk) 20:29, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - It's all basically self-generated with not even an IMDb and my searches found nothing good. SwisterTwister   talk  06:32, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk  12:37, 6 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮  JAaron95  Talk  17:56, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:BLP subject lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.