Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Quigley

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 03:02, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Andrew Quigley

 * Delete - vanity and useless.Gorrister 16:13, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. nn &mdash; Xezbeth 16:20, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 06:57, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity, nn. Vlad M V  &#1645; talk 19:30, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * We could wait for more information. Nah Delete Dsmdgold 00:55, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.