Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew R Crow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:46, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Andrew R Crow

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article was created in 2008 the day after Andrew Crow was deleted; both were created by, whose only contributions were these two articles and a promotional userpage. Refs are to articles authored by the subject, his employers, and organizations with which he has associations. If the claim made in the article about the discovery is true, he probably merits an article, but that claim is supported by a ref for which he was one of many authors, and also lacks third-party support. Mind matrix  17:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete no indication of notability.  appears to be as article claims, a bench scientist who has published, but there is no indication of secondary sourcing to establish that any of the 15 papers he has published are notable.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per E.M.Gregory's rationale above. Could we get an h-index for him? I'm not sure if that's as easily said as done. Jergling (talk) 23:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks like an h-index of 22. I'm not sure what that means in this field. agt x  16:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.