Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Rowland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Andrew Rowland

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominating for deletion because unclear what the subject's notability is. Tóraí (talk) 00:14, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Tóraí, what do you mean? Have you read the "Career" part? Not every article needs to say "X is famous because of Y." Drmies (talk) 01:51, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I mean the notability guidelines for biographies. --Tóraí (talk) 17:19, 3 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 07:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 07:21, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 07:21, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 07:21, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: relist for further comments
 * Delete pediatriacian who received a fellowship and honorary professorship. This is several orders of magnitude below what constitutes notability for an academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:39, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon  04:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - a pediatrician who has written some articles, given some speeches, and worked on some industry committees. The article and references seem self-promotional.--Rpclod (talk) 12:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.