Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Staunton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 04:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Andrew Staunton

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT due to lack of significant coverage. This (1) is the best I could find. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 05:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Cricket. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 05:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Australia.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:29, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: What a week to nominate him! He took only one first class wicket, but it was the wicket of Andrew Symonds. StAnselm (talk) 06:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per the additional sources that have been found. At worst, redirect to List of South Australian representative cricketers per WP:ATD, WP:PRESERVE, WP:R and WP:CHEAP.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 14:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:CRIN, which is now an essay rather than a guideline but still perfectly good as a guide to notability. StAnselm (talk) 15:32, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * KeepWeak keep per WP:HEY; and per Lugnuts. I've added 3 new refs (albeit from regional newspapers) found via Newsbank. Also note that StAnselm has also added a couple since the nomination. Cabrils (talk) 23:19, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I think there's enough here now for a GNG pass after the article was updated. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Enough now for a GNG pass and probably more stuff in regional Aussie print media. StickyWicket (talk) 22:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.