Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Stuart Pennington


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:07, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Andrew Stuart Pennington

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable, fails WP:BIO.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  20:25, 13 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  --  Eagles   24/7   (C)  20:26, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no coverage in reliable sources. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  10:03, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: BusStudent111 I believe this page is significant because the person in question, as stated in the article, is known and has worked across 2 continents for many major companies; has been an article of and contributed to literature, been a member of organizations and nominated to several boards related to the field; has been deeply involved in the process of creating products in the business; is still currently working for a major company and contributes to the subject and is well known throughout the tile industry. This industry may not be well known to Wikipedia itself but this page, linked with others such as the boards and companies can be a starting point to increase the knowledge that many people will come to use. Any information or suggestions as to what I could add or take away to improve the page will be greatly appreciated.
 * Comment: BusStudent111 I have also updated the sources a few days ago and can be read easier and are also cited in the text where relevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BusStudent111 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete: The sources cited are internal or trade publications, it seems. Individual notability isn't established; perhaps some information on this individual could be included in the page for Porcelanosa, which in any case needs a lot of copy-editing and wikifying. Leoniceno (talk) 03:02, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.