Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Taitz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was '''keep. Sufficient others sources have been found, and should be included in the article.'''. - Philippe 18:33, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Andrew Taitz

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

one article about his business does not a notable person make cOrneLlrOckEy (talk) 23:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yup. Delete as non-notable. X Marx The Spot (talk) 23:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   --  Beloved  Freak  23:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable ukexpat (talk) 00:53, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable. Renee (talk) 01:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - there is this Chicago Business News article and this Forbes article which are accessible without payment, and Google News search would indicate that more articles are available behind pay walls indicating that multiple reliable sources exist. -- Whpq (talk) 10:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Whpq's sources demonstrate notability, and here's another one for good luck. The article could do with a rewrite in a rather less gushing style. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Google Finance Article h8tow8ck (talk) 13:21, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.